A leaner future can still feel bold. The fashion retail chain that once colored mall culture will shut 500 stores while avoiding bankruptcy. Losses narrowed, leaders changed, and fresh funding arrived, so the brand is resetting for speed, focus, and digital reach. Fast fashion rewrote the rules; the company now plays to win under them. Because the plan targets waste and delay, margins can recover. Although memories matter, execution matters more. The next two years decide whether color returns to the bottom line.
Why this fashion retail chain is closing stores without bankruptcy
Leadership change set the tone. On June 18, 2024, CEO Massimo Renon completed his term and exited. Soon after, creative director Andrea Incontri left by agreement. Claudio Sforza stepped in to lead a tougher plan. The brief was simple and urgent, since results needed to move, not drift.
Numbers now support that urgency. In 2024, the group posted a โฌ60 million loss, far better than the โฌ230 million shortfall the year before. Edizione, the Benetton family holding company, injected โฌ260 million last year. Capital buys time to rightsize stores and modernize omnichannel systems without panic moves.
Closures follow a logic, not fear. The brand entered 2025 with more than 3,000 stores and had signaled at least 400 reductions. The plan now calls for 500 permanent closures across owned and partner sites. One healthy network beats a sprawling, uneven grid for a fashion retail chain competing on speed.
How faster design cycles and a tighter range will work
Speed is the great leveler, because fashion moves in weeks, not years. Development calendars will fall from 12 months to six. Designers can react to demand while dead stock shrinks. Shorter lead times reduce write-downs, raise full-price sell-through, and align supply with what shoppers actually want today.
Assortment will slim where data says it should. Management plans to thin slower lines, notably childrenโs wear and fringe categories. Fewer SKUs mean cleaner pricing, clearer stories, and steadier margin. A tight edit travels better across channels, since photos, shelves, and feeds reward sharp choices rather than cluttered racks.
Distribution meets demand, not nostalgia. The United States shifts to online-only, cutting fixed rent while keeping national reach. Elsewhere, top stores remain as e-commerce integrates click-and-collect and ship-from-store. Unified stock turns promises into reality, because availability drives conversion. That shift keeps the fashion retail chain accessible without legacy drag.
Factories, jobs, and the human cost of restructuring
Fast fashion reshaped apparel economics, and tradition felt the strain. A Sustainability Report described how rapid cycles and low prices pressured craft and timelines. Brands either adapt processes or cede share. The company chose adaptation, even as those choices weigh on workers, suppliers, and local communities across markets.
Footprints changed across several countries. According to Modaes, production sites in Tunisia, Croatia, and Serbia closed. In Italy, staff moved from Ponzano Veneto to Castrette di Villorba. Incentivized redundancies reduced headcount by more than one hundred. By the end of 2025, employees fell to about 700 from roughly 1,100 a year earlier.
Leaders acknowledge the human side. Claudio Sforza told union leaders the firm is securing itself, though conditions are complex and cooperation matters. Clear dialogue sustains trust during hard moves, while fair terms protect brand equity. Because loyalty counts, careful transitions help the fashion retail chain preserve skills it will need when growth returns.
Money milestones and when the fashion retail chain expects profit
The restructuring launched in October 2024 to curb losses and reset costs. With Edizioneโs funding secured, management targets profitability in 2026 or 2027. That window depends on execution quality, since savings appear only when closures complete, assortments simplify, and new calendars deliver inventory that sells on time.
Store math now favors concentration. A smaller estate should raise sales per square meter and lift gross margin. Online share grows as leases fall away. Systems must carry the load, because omnichannel depends on visibility and speed. When stock moves fluidly, returns fall, cart sizes rise, and repeat visits climb.
This is not a bankruptcy story; it is a controlled reset. The plan halves design lead times, trims slow sellers, and prunes unproductive sites, including a U.S. online-only model. If discipline sticks, fixed costs stop choking the P&L. That glidepath gives the fashion retail chain a real shot.
From bold campaigns to todayโs reset: a concise timeline
History explains the stakes. In 1988, United Colors ads embraced diversity. In 1990, โWe, on Death Rowโ sparked controversy and global debate. In 1995, shifting tastes forced a pivot. By 1999, an online presence emerged as retail changed and e-commerce began reshaping apparel discovery and buying behavior.
Between 2000 and 2005, fast-fashion chains scaled quickly and market share slipped. In 2010, socially charged campaigns returned. In 2020, the pandemic sped digital adoption, so e-commerce and marketing improved. Even with upgrades, reengaging younger shoppers stayed difficult, as rivals moved faster and priced sharper across seasons.
Analysts cite long erosion. UnionRayo highlights changing habits and cycle speed, while Shraddha Srivastava at NoNameGlobal notes strategy drift plus external pressure. Both views converge on agility and clarity. One tight plan, backed by data and funding, can still reposition the fashion retail chain for durable relevance.
A pragmatic path that narrows scope to regain momentum
This reset spares courtrooms and centers execution. The brand cuts 500 stores, halves design lead times, and prioritizes winners while leaning on digital. Because funding is secured and losses are shrinking, patience could pay off. The fashion retail chain now has a fair shot to turn bold color into black ink again.